CBA球队巡礼：辽宁——阵容大改战力锐减，外援将决定上限（CBA前瞻：辽宁队阵容巨变战力下滑，上限取决于外援）

Analyzing article approach

I want to take an analytical approach here, focusing on scenarios and general frameworks like strengths and weaknesses, rotation, tactics, and metrics from last season. I should avoid mentioning unverified transfers, even though the title suggests significant changes. Maybe I can ask a clarifying question about the specific changes. I could also provide two scenarios depending on team departures. It might be best to ask briefly first, then offer an outline for the article.Drafting team preview

I’m thinking of writing a preview for the Liaoning CBA team, focusing on a hypothetical new season with an aging domestic core. I want to mention injuries to key players and the possibility of foreign guards leaving. But I should frame everything conditionally to avoid making false claims. Instead of naming players directly, I might analyze impact categories. It could also be helpful to ask if the user wants a deeper analysis and to provide specifics about transfers before drafting the article.Structuring the analysis

The prompt suggests no heavy formatting, but I can use structured bullet points. I should propose an outline and ask a couple of quick clarifying questions: what departures or arrivals are expected, and what are the league rules for foreigners? It's important to note that the CBA has four quarters and specific rules regarding foreign players. My draft can analyze the impact of foreign guards versus wings and include rotation suggestions, matchups with key teams, and projections.

I’ll keep it concise but well-structured, covering conclusions, offseason trends, tactical impacts, foreign player configurations, and risk factors without mentioning specific player names. Since the user just provided a title, they might want a complete piece, so I’ll aim for a compact yet detailed article.Structuring roster analysis

I want to avoid any deception regarding player transfers, so I’ll use conditional phrasing like "如果." The title suggests significant changes, and I can accept that premise by discussing typical reasons like aging bigs, loss of core wings, and bench turnover. I'll mention public core players while being cautious about asserting departures.

In my analysis, I’ll cover conclusions, roster changes, tactical shifts, foreign player configurations, and matchup considerations, ensuring to keep it concise and structured with bullet points while sticking to a few hundred words.